The Trapped Idler Photon Interruptible Causality Experiment Methodology

By John Adams Theibert Jr

This article refers to the article found in this link: Trapped Idler Photons Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser Experiment.

The Trapped Idler Photons Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser Experiment Methodology.

This experiment will require two spacecraft one Astronomical Unit apart. The first spacecraft will house the experimental apparatus, and the second spacecraft will house reflecting mirrors to bounce the beams off of so that the photons can be trapped in the gap between the spacecrafts.

Likely, this experiment will have to be performed at a good distance from the sun to reduce solar wind interference. Putting the spacecrafts between the orbits of Uranus and Neptune or between Saturn and Uranus might be the best places in the solar system.
There are eight preliminary ways to run this experiment all of which need to be run to bench test predictions about different setups:

1. Set the rotatable mirrors to let the beams pass through and go on to the quantum eraser detectors. After the gap queue is full of photons and the first pattern would have formed, switch the rotatable mirrors to change the path of the trapped idler photons so that they go into the “which path” detectors.
2. This way is the same as experimental way 1, but don’t switch the path of the trapped photons to the “which way” detectors.
3. This way is the same as experimental way 1 but don’t form a pattern right away with the signal photons. Instead send the signal photons into the gap and trap them. Put the signal photons on a different path, reflecting off different reflectors than the idler photons at the other spacecraft. Rotate the mirrors to change the path of the trapped idler photons to send them to the “which way” detectors.
4. This way is the same as the experimental way 3, but don’t switch the path of the trapped photons to the “which way” detectors.
5. This way is the opposite setup of experimental way 1. Set the rotatable mirrors to send the beams to the “which way” detectors. After the gap queue is full of photons and the first pattern would have formed, switch the rotatable mirrors to change the path of the trapped idler photons so that they go on to the quantum eraser detectors.
6. This way is the same as experimental way 5, but don’t switch the path of the trapped photons to the quantum eraser detectors.
7. This way is the same as experimental way 5 but don’t form a pattern right away with the signal photons. Instead send the signal photons into the gap and trap them as well. Put the signal photons on a different path, reflecting off different reflectors than the idler photons at the other spacecraft. Rotate the mirrors to change the path of the trapped idler photons to send them to the quantum eraser detectors.
8. This way is the same as experimental way 7, but don’t switch the path of the trapped photons to the quantum eraser detectors.

Results for way 1: If the pattern at position 2 is an interference pattern, then there is no reverse time travel of the quantum entanglement information. If there is a clump pattern at position 2 then there is reverse time travel of the quantum entanglement information. Position 1 should show an interference pattern and position 3 should show a clump pattern.

Results for way 2: This way is a control for the quantum eraser. All three patterns should show up as interference patterns.

Results for way 3: If the pattern at position 2 is an interference pattern, then there is no reverse time travel of the quantum entanglement information and the fact that there was no formation of the pattern before the switch suggests that the pattern forming beforehand is not relevant to the results. If there is a clump pattern at position 2 then there is reverse time travel of the quantum entanglement information but it is not as clear, with a similar duplicity of reasoning as with the original delayed choice quantum eraser experiment, not ruling out photons predict the future perfectly. Position 1 should show an interference pattern and position 3 should show a clump pattern.

Results for way 4: This way is a control for the quantum eraser. All three patterns should show up as clump patterns.

Results for way 5: If the pattern at position 2 is a clump pattern, then there is no reverse time travel of the quantum entanglement information. If there is an interference pattern at position 2 then there is reverse time travel of the quantum entanglement information. Position 1 should show a clump pattern and position 3 should show an interference pattern.

Results for way 6: This way is a control for the quantum eraser. All three patterns should show up as clump patterns.

Results for way 7: If the pattern at position 2 is a clump pattern, then there is no reverse time travel of the quantum entanglement information and the fact that there was no formation of the pattern before the switch suggests that the pattern forming beforehand is not relevant to the results. If there is an interference pattern at position 2, then there is reverse time travel of the quantum entanglement information, but it is not as clear, with a similar duplicity of reasoning as with the original delayed choice quantum eraser experiment, not ruling out photons predict the future perfectly. Position 1 should show a clump pattern and position 3 should show an interference pattern.

Results for way 8: This way is a control for the quantum eraser. All three patterns should show up as clump patterns.

This experiment is intended to reveal or refute the existence of quantum time. If there is no reverse temporal causality, then there is interruptible causality which implies quantum time. Interruptible causality would happen only at the quantum time that the particles diverged temporally. Interruptible causality is related to the structure of the universe at the divergent quantum time and is the lowest state of the causal trajectory of the quantum entangled photons at the divergent quantum time. This means that a higher state of the causal trajectory of the quantum entangled photons can be created by changing the conditions of the flight path of the trapped idler photons. A higher state of the causal trajectory of the quantum entangled photons is not an interruptible trajectory because it is not part of the future uninterrupted flight sequence of the trapped idler photons at the divergent quantum time.

The existence of quantum time would suggest a super-fractalon basis for the universe. See The Plan of Arievlex for a preliminary description of the super-fractalon concept.